This is a clean example of how systems can remain procedurally active while losing the ability to actually correct harm. The rules exist, the paperwork moves, and the system stays operational, but the binding between process and consequence quietly disappears. From the tenant’s perspective nothing failed loudly, which is exactly why the outcome feels so devastating and so hard to contest.
This is a clean example of how systems can remain procedurally active while losing the ability to actually correct harm. The rules exist, the paperwork moves, and the system stays operational, but the binding between process and consequence quietly disappears. From the tenant’s perspective nothing failed loudly, which is exactly why the outcome feels so devastating and so hard to contest.
What is the remedy?
Remove the obstacles to proper enforcement. As in the people doing this on purpose.